Most Recent Publications

The Labour Appeal Court: Sexual harrassment in the spotlight

By Aadil Patel, Director, National Practice Head and Samantha Bonato, Associate Designate, Employment, Cliffe Dekker Hofmeyr

 

In the case of MEC for Education (North West Provincial Government) v M (JA37/2012) [2017] ZALAC 13 (3 February 2017), a school principal was disciplined for sexually harassing a fellow teacher on two separate occasions. A disciplinary hearing was held and he was dismissed by the Department of Education in the North West Province (MEC).

 

The principal referred a dispute to the Education Labour Relations Council, which ultimately found that his dismissal was fair. He took this decision on review to the Labour Court. The Labour Court found that the matter was settled because the parties (the principal and the fellow teacher) recorded that the allegations of sexual harassment or assault were discussed between them and amicably resolved. The principal was thus reinstated.

 

The MEC appealed the decision of the Labour Court and at the Labour Appeal Court, Judge Savage held that there was no settlement of the complaint. Furthermore, even if there was a settlement between the principal and the victim, the MEC was still entitled to take disciplinary action against an employee for misconduct in the context of the employment relationship.

 

In the case of Campbell Scientific Africa (Pty) Limited v Simmers and others [2015] JOL 34906 (LAC), it was held that an employer is entitled to discipline an employee for misconduct which was both related to and impacted on the employment relationship. In this instance, an employee had acted inappropriately in sexually harassing a colleague employed by another company. Although this had taken place outside of the workplace and outside of working hours, the seriousness of his misconduct made a future employment relationship impossible. The Labour Appeal Court therefore found that his dismissal was fair.

 

The Labour Appeal Court is understandably taking a much harder stance on sexual harassment. Where appropriate, employers must take firm action against employees for misconduct, irrespective of what the employee and the aggrieved party may agree among themselves. The settlement or resolution of the matter between the parties themselves does not preclude the employer from enforcing disciplinary measures against employees who commit acts of misconduct. This is true even where misconduct has occurred outside of the workplace and working hours. Workplace rules regulate the standard of conduct required within the context of the employment relationship and these standards must be upheld.

 

For more information please contact Aadil Patel at or Samantha Bonato at

Article published with the kind courtesy of Cliffe Dekker Hofmeyr www.cliffedekkerhofmeyr.com

 

 

 

 

Case Law Summaries and Articles

 

Can employees be dismissed for refusing to accept new terms and conditions of employment?

Can an employer dismiss employees because they refuse to agree to a change to their terms and conditions of employment? An initial answer may be, “yes”.

Read More >>>

 

Escape route: “Resignation with immediate effect”

The latest case in the ‘disciplining employees who have resigned with immediate effect’ saga has brought about more uncertainty as to whether an employee who resigns with immediate effect shortly before a disciplinary hearing can avoid disciplinary action and subsequent dismissal.

Read More >>>

 

Freedom of expression or incitement to commit an offence? A constitutional challenge

On 4 July 2019, the North Gauteng High Court handed down judgment in the case of The EFF and other v Minister of Justice and Constitutional Development and other (87638/2017 and 45666/2017) in which the EFF and Julius Malema (the applicants) sought to have s18(2)(b) of the Riotous Assemblies Act, No 17 of 1956 (Riotous Act) declared unconstitutional.

Read More >>>

 

Consolidated, comprehensive or general final written warnings

Regarding dismissal, according to the Code of Good Practice, “the courts have endorsed the concept of corrective or progressive discipline. This approach regards the purpose of discipline as a means for employees to know and understand what standards are required of them.

Read More >>>

 

 

 

 

 

 

Courses and Workshops

 

                                         

 
 

Compensation for Occupational Injuries and Diseases Course

22 August 2019 (Fully Booked)

Tsogo Sun: Century City: Cape Town

12 September 2019

Southern Sun: Maharani Towers: Durban

Employment Equity Committee Training

23 August 2019 (Fully Booked)

Emperors Palace: Convention Centre

29 August 2019 (Fully Booked)

Tsogo Sun: Century City: Cape Town

30 August 2019

Tsogo Sun: Century City: Cape Town

27 September 2019

Emperors Palace: Convention Centre

04 October 2019

Southern Sun: Maharani: Durban

Shop Steward Training

28 August 2019

Emperors Palace Convention Centre

Basic Labour Relations

04 September 2019

Emperors Palace: Convention Centre

The OHS Act and the Responsibilities of Management

13 September 2019

Southern Sun: Maharani Towers: Durban

19 September 2019

Emperors Palace: Convention Centre

28 November 2019

Protea Hotel By Marriott Tyger Valley: Cape Town

Managing Day to Day Issues/ Problem Employees Full day workshop

20 September 2019

Emperors Palace: Convention Centre

27 September 2019

Tsogo Sun: Century City: Cape Town

Hazard Identification & Risk Assessment Course

18 October 2019

Emperors Palace: Convention Centre

21 November 2019

Tsogo Sun: Century City: Stay Easy: Cape Town

Workshop Incident/Accident Investigation Course

25 October 2019

Emperors Palace: Convention Centre

22 November 2019

Tsogo Sun: Century City: Stay Easy: Cape Town

  

 Our Clients 

 

Android App On Google Play

Android App On Google Play