Most Recent Publications

 

No rest for the wicked Social Media Policy

By Nicholas Preston, Director and Lerato Malope, Candidate Attorney, Employment, Cliffe Dekker Hofmeyr

 

Our courts have often dealt with employees operating under the misconception that their social network sites are personal, private and detached from their employment. Employees may often feel secure under the guise offered by the divide between work and personal life, particularly during the festive “leave” season where employees spend less time in their work environment. However, dismissals on account of social media misconduct are on the rise.

 

In recent judgment EDCON Limited v Cantamessa and Others, the Labour Court found that a racist comment made by an employee while on leave constituted a dismissible offence. The Labour Court crystallised the principle that it is within an employer’s right to discipline its employee for misconduct which occurred outside the workplace, provided a connection can be established between the employees’ misconduct and the employer’s business.

 

In this case, the employee had identified herself as a specialist buyer for EDCON on her personal social media account wherein she posted comments, referring to former president Jacob Zuma, to the effect of:

 

“…and listening to these stupid f@!k1ng monkeys running our country and how everyone makes excuses for that stupid man we have to call a president...”

 

The employee posted this comment following a cabinet reshuffle during December 2015. The comments made by the employee gained traction on social media, which resulted in a formal complaint being laid against the employee by a customer of the employer.

 

The Labour Court considered the established principle that employers are precluded from taking disciplinary action against employees for misconduct perpetrated outside of the workplace furthermore outside of their ordinary hours of work. The court however drew a distinction, in this particular context, as the conduct of the employee had ultimately caught the attention of the greater public which cast a negative light on the reputation of the employer against its customer base which was predominantly black people.

 

The Labour Court ultimately found that while the comment was made on the employee’s private account, the comment did gain attention in the public domain albeit to a limited extent. However, within that limited range, the employer was associated with the employees’ conduct which opened up the employer to reputational damage.

 

It is important to note that an employee need not identify themselves as an employee of a certain company in order for them to fall foul of the employers disciplinary policies and code of conduct. In Dewoonarain v Prestige Car Sales (Pty) Ltd t/a Hyundai Ladysmith (2014) [MIBC] the employee made racist remarks against its employer and colleagues, without mentioning the employers name. The employee argued that the employer ought to prove how the employee’s comments could bring the company’s name is into disrepute, where its name was not mentioned. The arbitrator found that the issue was whether a reasonable inference could be drawn from the remarks that they were directed at the employer, thus creating a connection between the employees misconduct and the business of the employer. The arbitrator found this to be the case in that instant.

 

In the EDCON judgment, the employee fell within a group of employees whose identity largely remained anonymous, the court however provided:

 

“…once their identities are exposed to the general public, it must only be in a positive and not negative environment or circumstance, otherwise such disclosure imposes a risk that the name of Edcon may be brought into disrepute.”

 

Social media misconduct not only opens up the employee to dismissal, it further leaves employers exposed to vicarious liability for discrimination, harassment and defamation claims. In the case Pehlani v Minister of Police (9105/2011) [2014] ZAWCHC, the High Court held that it is not necessary for an employee to be acting within the course and scope of their employment to fall foul, provided a connection can be drawn between the misconduct of the employee and the employer’s business.

 

With the festive season approaching, employers must encourage employees to be mindful of the company’s social media policies and procedures, and most importantly their social media conduct as the failure to do so is likely to have devastating consequences for both the employer and its employees.

 

For more information contact Nicholas Preston at 

Article published with the kind courtesy of Cliffe Dekker Hofmeyr www.cliffedekkerhofmeyr.com

 

 

 

 

 

 

Courses and Workshops

 

                   

 

POPIA: Protection of Personal Information Act

14 August 2020 (09:00 - 12:00) (Fully Booked)

Interactive Online Course

27 August 2020 (09:00 - 12:00)

Interactive Online Course

Management and Leadership Skills

19, 20 & 21 August 2020 (08:30 - 16:00) (Fully Booked)

Interactive Online Course

09, 10 & 11 September 2020 (08:30 - 16:00)

Interactive Online Course

Health and Safety Representative and Committee Training Course

20 August 2020 (08:30 - 16:00)

Interactive Online Course

Covid19: The Reality: Workplace Matters After Lockdown

26 August 2020 (09:00 - 14:00)

Interactive Online Course

Investigation and Management of COVID-19 Cases in the Workplace

27 and 28 August 2020 (09:00 - 13:00)

Interactive Online Course

Employment Equity Committee Training

28 August 2020 (09:00 - 16:00)

Interactive Online Course

The OHS Act and the Responsibilities of Management

04 September 2020 (08:30 – 16:00)

Interactive Online Course

Basic Labour Relations

10 September 2020 (09:00 - 16:00)

Interactive Online Course 

 Our Clients 

 

Android App On Google Play

Android App On Google Play