CCMA Information


 There is a significant number of referrals based on facts that are misrepresented

Ivan Israelstam

 The CCMA is currently dealing with over 100 000 cases every year. This is in addition to the thousands of cases handled by the other labour law dispute-resolution bodies - the Labour Court, Labour Appeal Court, bargaining councils and private arbitration forums. The majority of these cases relate to allegations of unfairness brought by employees against employers.

These allegations include, but are not limited to, issues relating to: discrimination; dismissal for misconduct, poor performance, illness/injury or incompatibility; retrenchments; provision of benefits; training; promotion; demotion; suspension; warnings; pregnancy; probation; takeovers and mergers; whistle-blowing; sexual harassment; mutual interest dismissals; victimisation due to the exercising of legal or organisational rights.

The majority of these cases contain employee allegations that are backed up, to one extent or another, by facts.  On the other hand, there are a significant number of dispute referrals that are based on fabrication and/or facts that are deliberately misrepresented. I suspect this to be the case for a number of reasons:

  • Firstly, employees lose approximately 40% of cases referred to CCMA arbitration.

I accept that many of these cases have been lost due to poor provision of evidence by the employee rather than due to the fact that the allegations are false.
However, at least some of these cases brought by employees will have been lost due to the complete lack of truth.

  • Secondly, it is easy for employees to refer disputes to the CCMA and to most other dispute resolution bodies.

The referral process is simple and free of cost. Employees are allowed to refer cases and to present their cases at conciliation, arbitration and at court on their own, without representation.
 This means that they do not have to go to the expense of hiring lawyers to assist them.

This makes it tempting for dishonest employees to abuse the system in order to make some money at the expense of employers.

  • Thirdly, the CCMA does not charge employees for its services and it has processes to assist applicants with the process of lodging their disputes.
  • Fourthly, there are important motives for the bringing of false claims against employers.

There may be employees (hopefully they are in the small minority) who bring cases against employers due to vindictiveness based on some unrelated matter or because they would rather extort money out of employers at the CCMA than earn their money honestly.
 I have been involved in assisting employers with cases where the employee simply refers a case to CCMA or bargaining council as a means of evading discipline.

The strategy employed by such employees is that attack is the best form of defence. Not only is such a practice dishonest but it is also a waste of the CCMA's and the employer's time and resources.  It is therefore not surprising that the law provides for employees to be penalised for bringing frivolous or vexatious cases.

Frivolous means trivial or insignificant. Vexatious means annoying and groundless. In such cases the employee can be ordered to pay part of the employer's legal costs.  For example, in Simane v Coca-Cola (2006, 10 BALR 1044) the CCMA agreed that the employee had been guilty of dishonesty. As he had lodged a case for unfair dismissal knowing that it was not genuine the CCMA awarded costs against him.

In Ndwalane v The Magic Company (Pty) Ltd (2006, 5 BALR 497) the employee was employed on the basis of a fixed term contract. When the fixed term contract expired and he was told to go, he lodged an unfair labour practice case against the employer. However, he brought no proof of unfairness and the arbitrator found his case to have been frivolous and vexatious. He was ordered to pay part of the employer's legal costs.

While employees must beware of misusing the dispute-resolution process, employers need to exercise caution as well. That is, employers should:

  • Make sure that they do not give employees cause to take them to the CCMA or other dispute forum
  • Avoid jumping to the conclusion that the employee's case will be found to be fabricated, frivolous or vexatious.

That is, employers must not become complacent even when they are sure that the employee's allegations are false. The employer still needs to prepare and present a solid case to prove the falsity of the employee's claims

  • Obtain advice from a reputable labour law expert in investigating and assessing the employee's allegations and in preparing for the arbitration hearing.

Ivan Israelstam is chief executive of Labour Law Management Consulting. He can be contacted on 011-888-7944 or

Our appreciation to Ivan and The Star newspaper for permission to publish this article

Case Law Summaries and Articles


Can employees be dismissed for refusing to accept new terms and conditions of employment?

Can an employer dismiss employees because they refuse to agree to a change to their terms and conditions of employment? An initial answer may be, “yes”.

Read More >>>


Escape route: “Resignation with immediate effect”

The latest case in the ‘disciplining employees who have resigned with immediate effect’ saga has brought about more uncertainty as to whether an employee who resigns with immediate effect shortly before a disciplinary hearing can avoid disciplinary action and subsequent dismissal.

Read More >>>


Freedom of expression or incitement to commit an offence? A constitutional challenge

On 4 July 2019, the North Gauteng High Court handed down judgment in the case of The EFF and other v Minister of Justice and Constitutional Development and other (87638/2017 and 45666/2017) in which the EFF and Julius Malema (the applicants) sought to have s18(2)(b) of the Riotous Assemblies Act, No 17 of 1956 (Riotous Act) declared unconstitutional.

Read More >>>


Consolidated, comprehensive or general final written warnings

Regarding dismissal, according to the Code of Good Practice, “the courts have endorsed the concept of corrective or progressive discipline. This approach regards the purpose of discipline as a means for employees to know and understand what standards are required of them.

Read More >>>







Courses and Workshops




Compensation for Occupational Injuries and Diseases Course

22 August 2019 (Fully Booked)

Tsogo Sun: Century City: Cape Town

12 September 2019

Southern Sun: Maharani Towers: Durban

Employment Equity Committee Training

23 August 2019

Emperors Palace: Convention Centre

29 August 2019 (Fully Booked)

Tsogo Sun: Century City: Cape Town

30 August 2019

Tsogo Sun: Century City: Cape Town

Shop Steward Training

28 August 2019

Emperors Palace Convention Centre

Basic Labour Relations

04 September 2019

Emperors Palace: Convention Centre

The OHS Act and the Responsibilities of Management

13 September 2019

Southern Sun: Maharani Towers: Durban

19 September 2019

Emperors Palace: Convention Centre


 Our Clients