2016 12 14 Vermooten v DPE Ors (JA 91-15) JHB
2016 12 08 Vanchem Vanadium V National Union of Metalworkers (JA 33-16) JHB
2016 11 24 Mhlekude v SAA (PA 05-15) PE
2016 11 22 Ntshatsheli Nogcantsi V Malusi Mbuli NO (PA 07-15) PE
2016 11 08 Gways CMT v NBCCMI and others (CA 11-15)
2016 11 08 TFD Network v Singh NO (CA 16-15) JHB
2016 09 02 Msunduzi Municipality v Hoskins (DA 14-15) DBN
2016 08 22 Commercial Stevedoring Agricultural V Robertson Abattoir (CA 12-15) CT
2016 07 27 Woolworths (Pty) Ltd v SACCAWU ors (JA 38-15) JHB
2016 07 21 Cynthia Theresia Motsomotso v Mogale Local Municipality (JA 44-15) JHB
2016 07 06 Plastic Converters v NUMSA Others (JA 112-14) JHB
2016 06 28 Pack 'n Stack v Mdletshe (DA 05-15) DBN
2016 06 28 KZN Tourism Auhtority v WASA (JA 113-14) JHB
2016 06 28 Macdonalds transport v AMCU (JA 10-16) JHB
2016 06 28 CCMA v MBS (JA 94-15) JHB
2016 06 28 Francis Baard District Municipality v Rex (JA 29-15) JHB
2016 06 15 Gustavus Smook V Department of Transport Roads and Public Works (JA 68-15) JHB
2016 06 15 DIKOBE v SUN CITY (JA 45-15) JHB
2016 06 14 Windybrow Theatre v Vuyo Maphela (JA 47-15) JHB
2016 06 14 Marthinussen V Vusi Daniel Kubeka (JA 41-14) JHB
2016 06 14 Xstrata v Masha (JA 4-15) JHB
2016 06 14 Mndebele v Xstrata (JA 57-12) JHB
2016 06 14 J Kruger and others v Aciel (JA 87-14) JHB
2016 06 13 Monde Chris Satani v Department of Education Western Cape (CA 10-15) CT
2016 05 12 ZAPOP v Cunningham (CA 21-14) CT
2016 05 12 DENOSA v Western Cape Department of Health and 2 others (CA 17-14) CT
2016 05 11 AMCU v Buffalo Coal ( JA 42-15) JHB
2016 04 20 Mogwele Waste V Gerhard Matthys Brynard (CA 15-15) CT
2016 04 15 Karoo Hoogland Municipality V Nothnagel (CA 07-14) CT
2016 04 15 IMATU v Drakenstein Muncipality (CA 01-14) CT
2016 03 24 HOSPERSA ono T Shambi V Dept Health KZN (DA 1-15) DBN
2016 03 24 AMCU v The chamber of Mines of South Africa (JA 103-14) JHB


POPI and consent - don’t get caught in your own net

By Gillian Lumb, Director, Kara Meiring, Candidate Attorney, Cliffe Dekker Hofmeyr


2020 has given rise to many challenges for employers. The Protection of Personal Information Act 4 of 2013 (POPI) poses yet another challenge. Employers have a grace period of one year as of 1 July 2020 within which to ensure their compliance with POPI.


POPI distinguishes between the collection, storage and processing of personal information and special person information. Special personal information includes e.g. an employee’s race or ethnic origin, health or sex life, religious or philosophical beliefs and trade union membership. Securing an employee’s consent is one of the basis on which an employer can lawfully process both general and special personal information of its employees.


It is crucial for employers to understand the meaning and interpretation of consent within the context of POPI. While employers may hope for a “quick fix” to ensure compliance and trust that including a broad, “catch all” consent in employees’ contracts of employment will be suffice – this may not prove to be adequate in every instance. A general consent may be sufficient to cover some of the personal information that will be processed during the course of an employee’s employment, however employers should be aware of the risks associated with relying on blanket consents in every instance.


Section 1 of POPI defines consent as “any voluntary, specific and informed expression of will in terms of which permission if given for the processing of personal information”. Written consent is not expressly required. However, it will be for the employer in its capacity as responsible party to show that it has secured an employee’s consent where it is relying on consent. In the circumstances it is advisable for employees’ written consent to be secured.


The requirement that consent be voluntary, specific and informed means that there should not be any pressure or force placed on an employee to consent. The employee should also be sufficiently aware of the content of the processing given the requirement that the consent is informed.


The Information Regulator has yet to give guidance on the interpretation of consent in terms of POP. In all likelihood it will have regard to the General Data Protection Regulation 2016/679 (GDPR) which requires that the consent is unambiguous and must be given by a clear affirmative act. It may well be that the Information Regulator interprets consent restrictively in keeping with the GDPR.


In the circumstances clauses relating to the processing of personal information in employees’ contracts of employment which are aimed at securing employees’ consent to the processing, should at minimum set out the nature and scope of the personal information that is to be processed, the reason for the processing, consent to further processing, consent to collection from a source other than the employee and consent to the transfer of the information. The employees must be able to understand in clear language what they are consenting and the extent of the consent. Where necessary provisions should also be made specifically for the processing of special personal information.


Employers should bear in mind that POPI does not demand consent in every instance and that processing may take place without consent where e.g. the processing is required in terms of law, or for the purposes of protecting a legitimate interest of the employee.


Employers will need to determine on a case by case basis whether the processing which they wish to conduct falls within the scope of the consent which they may have secured from an employee in his or her contract of employment or whether they will need to rely on one of the other basis set out in POPI.


Both special and general personal information may be processed lawfully if the processing is necessary for the “establishment, exercise or defence of a right or obligation in law”. This would cover instances where e.g. an employer processes employees’ personal information to comply with its obligations under the Employment Equity Act.


An employer can process general personal information without an employee’s consent where such processing either protects a legitimate interest of the employee, or is “necessary for pursuing the legitimate interest of the responsible party or of a third party to whom it is supplied”. While the term “legitimate interest” is not defined in POPI, it is likely that the Information Regulator will seek guidance from the GDPR in this regard. The GDPR has established a three-pronged test in interpreting “legitimate interest” which considers purpose, necessity, and balance. It first asks, “Is there a legitimate reason or purpose for the processions?”, secondly “Is processing the information necessary for that purpose” and thirdly “Is the legitimate interest overridden by the interests of the data subject?


A determination is made as to whether there is a “legitimate interest” for the purposes of processing personal information based on the answers to these three questions.


So as not to fall foul of the provisions of POPI it is recommended that employers develop internal policies that will assist them in determining whether in each instance, personal information to be processed is covered by the general consent clause in an employee’s contract of employment alternatively, by one of the other basis for lawful processing. In the absence thereof, the employer will need to prepare and secure a further consent from the employee.


For more information, please contact Gillian Lumb at

Article published with the kind courtesy of Cliffe Dekker Hofmeyr www.cliffedekkerhofmeyr.com






Courses and Workshops




Basic Labour Relations

28 January 2021 (09:00 - 16:00) (Fully Booked)

Interactive Online Course

05 February 2021 (09:00 - 16:00)

Interactive Online Course 

Employment Equity Committee Training

29 January 2021 (09:00 - 16:00) (Fully Booked)

Interactive Online Course

11 February 2021 (09:00 - 16:00)

Interactive Online Course

COVID-19 Workplace Compliance Health, Safety and Claims Management Course

03 & 04 February 2021 (08:30 - 13:00) (Fully Booked)

Interactive Online Course

09 & 10 February 2021 (08:30 - 13:00)

Interactive Online Course

POPIA: Protection of Personal Information Act

04 February 2021 (09:00 - 12:00)

Interactive Online Course

The OHS Act and the Responsibilities of Management

11 February 2021 (08:30 – 16:00)

Interactive Online Course

Managing Poor Performance/ Incapacity

12 February 2021 (09:00 - 12:00)

Interactive Online Course

Health and Safety Representative and Committee Training Course

18 February 2021 (08:30 - 16:00)

Interactive Online Course

Workshop Chairing Disciplinary Hearings

25 & 26 February 2021 (09:00 - 16:00)

Interactive Online Course


 Our Clients 


Android App On Google Play

Android App On Google Play